Sorry I edited my previous post after you posted.
I hate it when people do that. Sorry
I do it all the time. I'm too quick to hit the Post Reply button.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
Sorry I edited my previous post after you posted.
I hate it when people do that. Sorry
I do it all the time. I'm too quick to hit the Post Reply button.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
If the UK became majority American or Australian I would be pissed off.
Fine but I don't think immigration policy should be constructed based simply on whether it pisses people off or not. There are bigger issues at stake than cultural preservation at this point.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
I think my big issue with the skin colour talk is that it misses the point of what truly makes us different. It's what's in our heads that makes us different. I have a lot of non-white acquaintances and they are as varied as any random group. It's more that than the racism angle that irks me. Although, it is racist, let's not kid ourselves.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
Please explain how we get from there to a society where White British are a minority without astonishing levels of immigration?
Oh come on, I never spoke of the plausibility, I was arguing on principle. Could it happen overnight? No. Could it even happen in several decades with present levels of immigration? No. But would it be a bad thing if eventually the UK was majority non-white? I'll leave that for you to answer.
It certainly could happen with moderate levels over a period of centuries and that would be fine by me. LUHE seems to want the UK to remain majority-white indefinitely and there simply isn't any justification for this. If LUHE had said majority-democratic or majority-pluralist or even majority-non-Muslim, I'd have no such issue.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
The UK is, generally speaking, a very tolerant country. Nevertheless, UK citizens do not want to be swamped by foreigners who have no respect for UK law and customs.
I know, which is why we need better integration and better checks on who exactly is coming into the country, no argument there. What we don't need however is a quota on skin colour ratios.
As for the Sentinelese, their motivations may be pure to a degree, but their methods of dealing with visitors is nothing to be admired. Their way of life is so different from ours that is hard to imagine how we could ever converse with them, let alone integrate. But the people migrating to the UK are not quite as different.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
No I strongly disagree with you because you are in denial about the scale of the problem. Integration can ONLY succeed when immigration is done slowly and gradually so that immigrants are motivated to become part of the indigenous population and not form foreign enclaves.
That is impossible with current rates of immigration.
Sir, what on earth is wrong with you? All I have argued against is the necessity for a majority-white society. I haven't at any point said that immigration policy doesn't need to change at all. Quite the opposite, I've suggested better integration, which de facto means changes to immigration policy. You in turn have suggested a way towards achieving this. No disagreement there. If I am in denial about the scale of the problem (not sure how you'd know, as I've not quantified anything), then perhaps you are in denial about the motives of those who argue for a 'majority white society'.
I might add that it's not so much the rate of immigration that's the problem, but the spread of it. But there are political reasons for that which will be very hard to do anything about. The rich aren't exactly keen on immigrants, and they are the people who hold sway ultimately.
You don't know much about Brits do you?
I don't know what FTS knows, but I know that us Brits aren't a monolith.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
The Roman empire did not end until 1453 when the Ottoman army broke into the city of Constantinople (Byzantium also called by some, New Rome) and brought the final end to the Roman Empire. (That's unless you believe in a Eurocentric view of the world).
I mean I think it was clear that I meant the pre-schism empire.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
12 - There was a memorable post here a while ago from a poster from northern England with very high rate of immigration.
He described the reality of life in his town. The vast majority of kids in his children's school came from families where English was not the first language. Many of the children had poor language skills. Getting an appointment with the GP was very difficult. All public services were under extreme pressure as a result of dealing with needy immigrants. But more than that, everything had changed suddenly and dramatically. Not the kind of inevitable change that happens over a few decades, not the nostalgic feelings about an idyllic past but dramatic transformation that nobody voted for.
Now there is a significant percentage of people who don't share English values, who don't speak English, who have contempt for our culture and freedoms.
And anybody who dares to point out how profoundly unfair this imposition is has to put up with self-appointed guardians of virtue telling them they are nothing but small-minded racists.
In other words, you agree with me. The solution is better integration. Closing borders is certainly not the solution. You don't deal with a problem by destroying it, you cope through adaption. The northerners I've met all agree that immigration has caused issues where they live, but they don't think the solution is to end it, but rather for the rate of it to be tempered, not something I'd argue against at all. They certainly aren't calling for a majority-white society though, that's completely unnecessary, and that's what I was arguing against, if you'll remember.
And please don't school me on evolution, I'm not a creationist. I was making a facetious point. I'm not a Lamarckian and I know it's not about giraffe's necks choosing to get longer to reach the apple, it was a joke man, stop making scientists look like pedantic humour-vacuums.
THIS is why the liberal left have lost their way and ceded the floor to actual racists.
I'm not of the liberal left at this point, haven't identified with them for years.
Try and look past people's skin, seriously - ok.
We white people can en masse move to North Sentinel Island, and take over the traditional home of the Sentinelese people.
If they object, you will tell them to look past people's skin ... I'm sure you'll do that and I'm sure the Sentinelese will heed your wise words.
Look out, Sentinelese, the future could be white.
Change ... it happens, Sentinelese ... deal with it.
Just lie down and accept it. Bend over, whilst I f**k you up the ass with no lube.
I'm white, and I'd love to move to your tropical island. C'mon fellow whiteys, let's all move to North Sentinel Island. Let's outbreed the locals and make the island white.
I'm sure the 12 Apostates would be ok with this because he doesn't care what skin colour migrants have.
Yes, I'd be complete ok with it. The Sentinelese on the other hand wouldn't, because they are a primitive, violent tribe of individuals who have no knowledge of the outside world. And if you're using them as an example for us white people to follow then perhaps you ought to re-examine whom you choose to idolise.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
No, it's not, because with the greatest respect you're not the enlightening sage you think you are.
Change. It happens, deal with it. Nothing lasts forever. Didn't you learn that when you left behind the JWs.
Why does it matter what colour people are on any given piece of land, it's irrelevant. We're all human and it's the diversity of ideas that makes the world interesting, not the spread of pigmentation.
If it makes you feel any better, after a few generations here, the darker people's descendants will gradually become whiter anyway, as an adaption to the lack of sunlight. Unless of course everyone starts taking vitamin D supplements, but that's just progress I suppose.
Try and look past people's skin, seriously.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
Keeping the UK majority-white should be part of that, IMHO.
Why?